Tuesday, February 18, 2020

The National Health Service and the Risk Assessment Techniques Research Paper

The National Health Service and the Risk Assessment Techniques - Research Paper Example The incident took place on an eight-bed ward for female admissions in a small National Health Service (NHS) institution. Dorothy Perkins has a history of considerable antisocial conduct. She is a thirty-five-year-old woman who has been nursed within this inpatient facility for almost three years and will be referred to as. Ms Perkins was admitted from Her Majesty’s Prison Service following ruling from the Crown Court that she requires a period of assessment after the attempted murder of her community care worker. Ms Perkins presents as floridly psychotic with underlying persecutory delusions and presents as unstable in her mood. Her view is that other people (staff, visitors, family and the common public) are plotting against her and attempting to murder her. Despite this, she is able to forge a level of therapeutic alliance with some staff members, in particular, male staff members. She is verbally abusive and with her large physical stature is intimidating towards the other service users on the ward and staff members. Her abuse is usually targeted towards female staff members, and she has assaulted another female service user on the ward during this admission. The multi-disciplinary team has ruled that any episodes of inappropriate conduct from Ms Perkins whilst she is around the communal areas of the ward must result in a period of ‘time-out’. In accordance with the Code of Practice to the Mental Health Act 1983 (1999), ‘time out’ is a behaviour modification technique which denies a patient, for a period of no more than 15 minutes.

Monday, February 3, 2020

Literacy and ELL students Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Literacy and ELL students - Essay Example This 66 9-page volume reports the culmination of a four-year process by the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, which includes 13 expert researchers in reading, language, bilingualism, research methods, and education. The mission of the National Literacy Panel was twofold: ‘to identify, assess, and synthesize research on the education of language-minority children and youth with respect to their attainment of literacy and to produce a comprehensive report evaluating and synthesizing this literature’† (Grant, Wong, and Osterling, 2007). The outline of the subtopics in this topic is fairly easy to follow and mimics the outline of other books on the subject. The topic is typically divided into sections, and the first book that will be illustrated in this case was written by Grant, Wong, and Osterling (2007). These include the initial introduction that was introduced above, Introduction to the Reviewers and Our Approach to the Review, The Heteroglossic Nature of Biliteracy, Defining Heteroglossia, Heteroglossia: Cross-Linguistic Implications, Heteroglossia and Bilingualism, Heteroglossia and Assessment, A Sociocultural Approach to Literacy Research, Definition of the Social,Contrasting Views on the Social, Sociocultural Frameworks: The Funds of Knowledge, Shifting the Paradigm: Multidimensional, Defining Literacy for the 21st Century, Autonomous Versus Ideological Models of Literacy, Literacy: Extending the Frameworks, and the authors’ Closing Thoughts. Since there is only a limited amount of space in this article review, a brief account of each of the above sections will be covered. With regard to the Introduction to the Reviewers and Our Approach to the Review, professionals emphasize how they chose a group of very diverse candidates to perform their critique. They generally feel that is an important step in getting a